To “ a Theory of Disagreement in Repeated Games with Bargaining ”
نویسنده
چکیده
THEOREM 9: For each i, let a be a pure action profile in the stage game. If aii is a best response to ai−i for both i and (π2 −π1) · (u(a2)− u(a1)) > 0, then the following two-state automaton strategy, with states 1 and 2, yields a BSG set for δ sufficiently high: • Disagreement: In state i, make no transfers and play a in the action phase. If player j = i deviates unilaterally, go to state j; otherwise stay in state i. • Agreement: Play arg maxa ∑ i ui(a) in the action phase and pay transfers that split the surplus with respect to disagreement play in the current state. If nobody deviates or both deviate, randomize between the two states with equal probabilities. If player i deviates unilaterally, go to state i. The continuation values in the two states are the endpoints of a BSG set contained in V (SCE).
منابع مشابه
A Theory of Disagreement in Repeated Games with Bargaining
This paper proposes a new approach to equilibrium selection in repeated games with transfers, supposing that in each period the players bargain over how to play. Although the bargaining phase is cheap talk (following a generalized alternating-offer protocol), sharp predictions arise from three axioms. Two axioms allow the players to meaningfully discuss whether to deviate from their plan; the t...
متن کاملEfficiency in Negotiation: Complexity and Costly Bargaining∗
Even with complete information, two-person bargaining can generate a large number of equilibria, involving disagreements and inefficiencies, in (i) negotiation games where disagreement payoffs are endogenously determined (Busch and Wen [4]) and (ii) costly bargaining games where there are transaction/participation costs (Anderlini and Felli [2]). We show that when the players have (at the margi...
متن کاملA Theory of Disagreement in Repeated Games with Renegotiation
This paper develops the concept of contractual equilibrium for repeated games with transferable utility, whereby the players negotiate cooperatively over their continuation strategies at the start of each period. Players may disagree in the negotiation phase, and continuation play may be suboptimal under disagreement. Under agreement, play is jointly optimal in the continuation game, and the pl...
متن کاملAeory of Disagreement in Repeated Games with Bargaining
is paper proposes a new approach to the problem of equilibrium selection in repeated games with transfers, by supposing that in each period the players bargain over how to play. Although the bargaining phase is cheap talk (which follows a generalized alternating-offer protocol), sharp predictions arise from three axioms. Two axioms allow the players to meaningfully discuss whether to deviate f...
متن کاملTransfer of Bargaining Power Sources in Oil Trade Games
Bargaining Power is one of the important issues in oil trade negotiations. In this paper two effective factors in bargaining power i.e. patient time to deal and outside options of each player have been considered. The necessary relations for exchange of sources in negotiation have been derived.
متن کاملPricing and Advertising Decisions in a Three-level Supply Chain with Nash, Stackelberg and Cooperative Games
Pricing and advertising are two important marketing strategies in the supply chain management which lead to customer demand’s increase and therefore higher profit for members of supply chains. This paper considers advertising, and pricing decisions simultaneously for a three-level supply chain with one supplier, one manufacturer and one retailer. The amount of market demand is influenced ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013